For much of US history, the federal government employed sinking funds as de
vices to support the market for its debt. The policy was inaugurated by Ham
ilton in 1790 as a method of enhancing public credit by committing the gove
rnment to redeem its debt. We interpret the commitment, as others have inte
rpreted the gold standard, as a way of achieving time consistency of govern
ment policy. Although steeped in controversies about the utility of sinking
funds, subsequent US history did reflect that commitment-until the 1930s.
Since the 1930s, the view of Hamilton's opponents, namely Jefferson and Mad
ison, that the government's hands should not be tied by commitments such as
sinking funds have prevailed, just as the gold standard itself was abandon
ed. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.