This paper provides an expository discussion of the interrelationships betw
een least squares (LS), principal component regression (PCR), partial least
squares (PLS), ridge regression (RR), generalized ridge regression (GRR),
continuum regression (CR) and cyclic subspace regression (CSR) for the line
ar model y = Xb + e. Developed in this paper is continuum CSR (CCSR). From
this study it is ascertained that GRR encompasses LS, PCR, PLS, RR, CR, CSR
and CCSR. It is shown that a regression vector, regardless of its source,
can be written as a linear combination of the vi eigenvectors obtained from
a singular value decomposition (SVD) of X, i.e. X = U Sigma V-T. Similarly
, it is shown that calibration fitted values (y) over cap obtained from any
linear regression method can be written as a linear combination of the u(i
) eigenvectors obtained from an SVD of X. Formulae are provided to compute
phi and y, respective vectors of weights for v(i) and u(i) eigenvectors. It
is recommended that the phi eigenvector weights be inspected to ascertain
exactly what information is being used to form the regression vector for th
e particular modeling approach used. Analogously, the gamma eigenvector wei
ghts should be inspected to determine what information is being used to for
m calibration fitted values. Besides assisting in prediction rank determina
tion, both eigenvector weight plots also allow for easy comparison of model
s built by different methods, e.g, the PCR model versus the PLS model. It i
s shown that it is not the number of factors used to build a PCR or PLS mod
el that is important, but the number of eigenvectors used, which ones, and
how they are weighted to form respective regression vectors and fitted valu
es of calibration samples. In essence, how eigenvectors are weighted dictat
es which GRR model is formed. From the CR, CSR and RR eigenvector weight pl
ots of phi it is concluded that the optimal model will most often have a co
mbination of PCR and PLS attributes. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd.