Objective: Ceramic inlays are used as esthetic alternatives to amalgam and
other metallic materials for the restoration of badly damaged teeth. Howeve
r, only limited clinical data are available regarding adhesive inlays and o
nlays with proximal margins located in dentine. In a prospective, controlle
d clinical study, the performance of IFS Empress inlays and onlays with cus
pal replacements and margins below the amelocemental junction was examined,
Materials and methods: Ninety-six IFS Empress fillings were placed in 34 p
atients by six clinicians. The restorations were luted with four different
composite systems. The dentin bonding system Syntac Classic was used in add
ition to the acid-etch-technique, At baseline and after 6 months, one, two
and four years after placement the restorations were assessed by two calibr
ated investigators using modified USPHS codes and criteria. A representativ
e sample of the restorations was investigated by scanning electron microsco
py to evaluate wear.
Results: Seven of the 96 restorations investigated had to be replaced (fail
ure rate 7%; Kaplan-Meier). Four inlays had suffered cohesive bulk fracture
s and three teeth required endodontic treatment. After four years in clinic
al service, significant deterioration (Friedman 2-way Anova; p < 0.05) was
found to have occurred in the marginal adaptation of the remaining restorat
ions. Seventy-nine percent of the surviving restorations exhibited marginal
deficiencies, independent of the luting composite. Neither the absence of
enamel margins, nor cuspal replacement significantly affected the adhesion
or marginal quality of the restorations. Conclusion: After four years, exte
nsive IPS Empress inlays and onlays bonded with the dentin bonding system S
yntac Classic were found to have a 7% failure rate with 79% of the remainin
g restorations having marginal deficiencies. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd,
All rights reserved.