M. Robert et al., Piezoelectric lithotripsy of ureteral stones: Influence of shockwave frequency on sedation and therapeutic efficiency, J ENDOUROL, 13(3), 1999, pp. 157-160
Objective: The aim of this randomized study was to assess the relation betw
een shockwave frequency, sedation, and efficiency in piezoelectric extracor
poreal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for ureteral calculi.
Methods: A random sample of 114 patients aged between 15 and 74 (mean 45) y
ears were treated at the shockwave frequencies of 1 (N = 57) or 4 (N = 57)
per second using the EDAP LT 02 lithotripter at maximum energy. The stones'
largest diameter ranged from 5 to 18 mm (mean 7.6 mm). Lower ureteral ston
es were treated with the patient in the prone position and upper ureteral s
tones in supine position. The duration of SWL sessions and stone measuremen
ts were statistically similar for patients treated at low and high frequenc
ies. The levels of required sedation (none, intramuscular analgesia, intrav
enous sedation-analgesia) and stone-free rates after one session were analy
zed by Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test.
Results: Sedation did not differ statistically with SWL frequency for mid a
nd lower ureteral calculi. However, the use of intravenous sedation-analges
ia was less common for patients with upper ureteral stones treated at low r
ather than high frequency (19% and 100%, respectively; P < 0.0001), The suc
cess rate was significantly lower (P = 0.04) for lower ureteral calculi tre
ated at low v high frequency (65% and 89%, respectively) but was not statis
tically affected by frequency for upper ureteral stones.
Conclusion: We recommend high frequency for piezoelectric SWL of lower uret
eral calculi, especially for stones with a maximum diameter greater than or
equal to 8 mm. On the other hand, low-frequency SWL appears to be suitable
for the treatment of upper ureteral stones.