Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory rejection in heart and lung transplant recipients

Citation
Dr. Onsager et al., Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory rejection in heart and lung transplant recipients, J HEART LUN, 18(5), 1999, pp. 448-455
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
10532498 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
448 - 455
Database
ISI
SICI code
1053-2498(199905)18:5<448:EOTITT>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Background: Refractory acute cellular rejection may occur despite triple-dr ug immunosuppression (cyclosporine A, steroids, azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil). The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of tacrol imus rescue therapy in patients maintained on cyclosporine-based immunosupp ression (CBI). Methods: Between December 1993 and October 1996, 208 patients underwent tho racic organ transplantation at the Hospital of the University of Wisconsin at Madison. One hundred forty-nine patients underwent heart replacement; 59 underwent lung transplantation. One hundred thirty-nine of the heart trans plant cohort received CBI preceded by induction therapy with OKT3. Forty-si x of the lung transplant cohort received CBI without induction cytolytic th erapy. Refractory rejection was defined as failure to respond to high-dose steroids (500 mg to 1 g IV methylprednisolone for 3 days) and/or nionoclona l antibody therapy (OKT3, 5 to 10 mg IV/day for 7 to 14 days). In patients with refractory rejection, cyclosporine was replaced with tacrolimus. Results: Overall, 16% (30/185) of patients receiving CBI experienced refrac tory rejection. Thirty-one episodes of grade IIIa or greater rejection occu rred in 11% (15/139) of heart transplant recipients. Twenty episodes of gra de II to IV rejection occurred in 33%(15/46) of lung transplant recipients. After tacrolimus rescue therapy, 93% (14/15) of patients in the heart tran splant group converted to grade II or less rejection. Refractory rejection was reversed in 73% (11/15) of the lung transplant group. Reversal was docu mented at biopsy in all (8/8) lung recipients in whom it had been histologi cally identified. FEV, values of 3 additional patients stabilized. Conclusions: The incidence of refractory rejection in thoracic organ transp lant recipients on CBI is significant. Reversal of refractory rejection fol lows rescue immunotherapy with tacrolimus.