W. Muellbacher et al., The role of the intact hemisphere in recovery of midline muscles after recent monohemispheric stroke, J NEUROL, 246(4), 1999, pp. 250-256
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex was used to stu
dy basic mechanisms of motor reorganization after major hemispheric stroke
in humans. We sought to clarify the possible role of the intact hemisphere
in motor recovery of the lingual muscles, and to evaluate the compensatory
use of preexisting uncrossed motor pathways projecting to these midline mus
cles. TMS and bilateral surface recordings from the lingual muscles were ca
rried out in six selected stroke patients who presented with a unilateral l
ingual paralysis after a limited monohemispheric ischemia. The first examin
ation was performed during the symptomatic stage (t(1)) and was repeated af
ter complete recovery of lingual function had been established (t(2)) The c
ortical motor output patterns were analyzed and compared with the data from
40 healthy controls. In the controls TMS of either hemisphere invariably p
roduced contralateral and ipsilateral compound muscle action potentials (CM
APs), elicited through crossed and uncrossed central motor pathways, respec
tively. In most individuals an asymmetric cortical motor output pattern was
found, as significantly greater mean CMAPs of shorter onset latencies were
recorded from the contralateral lingual muscles than from the ipsilateral
responses. In the six patients with a unilateral lingual paralysis a simila
r pattern was found on initial examination by stimulating the intact hemisp
here, whereas TMS of the affected hemisphere failed to elicit any CMAP bila
terally. At t(2) all patients had regained normal lingual function. Only on
e patient showed evidence of a complete recovery of the primarily affected
hemisphere, as TMS now elicited normal CMAPs bilaterally. In the remaining
five patients the unilateral interruption of the corticonuclear pathways pe
rsisted in spite of complete functional recovery. In these subjects the rec
overy of symmetric lingual movements must be attributed to the intact hemis
phere. From this it is concluded that recovery of a unilateral lingual para
lysis after restricted monohemispheric lesions is possible without recovery
of the cortical motor projections from the affected hemisphere. in these c
ases the intact hemisphere is responsible for restoration of normal lingual
movements, most likely by potentiating the effect of preexisting uncrossed
motor pathways.