Er. Kokoska et al., The impact of intraoperative culture on treatment and outcome in children with perforated appendicitis, J PED SURG, 34(5), 1999, pp. 749-753
Background: Most protocols for the operative treatment of perforated append
icitis use a routine culture. Although isolated studies suggest that routin
e culture may not be necessary, these recommendations generally are not bas
ed on objective outcome data.
Methods: The authors reviewed the records of 308 children who underwent ope
rative treatment for perforated appendicitis between 1988 and 1998 to deter
mine if information gained from routine culture changes the management or i
mproves outcome. Inclusion criteria included either gross or microscopic ev
idence of appendiceal perforation.
Results: Mean patient age was 7.5 years, 51% were boys, and there was no mo
rtality. The majority of children (96%) underwent culture that was positive
for either aerobes (21%), anaerobes (19%), or both (57%). Antibiotics were
changed in only 16% of the patients in response to culture results. The us
e of empiric antibiotics, as compared with modified antibiotics, was associ
ated with a lower incidence of infectious complication, shorter fever durat
ion, and decreased length of hospitalization. We also investigated the rela
tionship between culture isolates and antibiotic regimens with regard to ou
tcome. The utilization of antibiotics suitable for the respective culture i
solate or organism sensitivity was associated with an increased incidence o
f infectious complication and longer duration of both fever and length of h
ospitalization. Finally, the initial culture correlated poorly with subsequ
ent intraabdominal culture (positive predictive value, 11%).
Conclusion: These outcome data strongly suggest that the practice of obtain
ing routine cultures can be abandoned, and empiric broad spectrum antibioti
c coverage directed at likely organisms is completely adequate for treatmen
t of perforated appendicitis in children.