Gas phase free energies of formation and free energies of solution of C-alpha-centered free radicals from alcohols: A quantum mechanical - Monte Carlo study

Citation
Da. Block et al., Gas phase free energies of formation and free energies of solution of C-alpha-centered free radicals from alcohols: A quantum mechanical - Monte Carlo study, J PHYS CH A, 103(18), 1999, pp. 3562-3568
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
ISSN journal
10895639 → ACNP
Volume
103
Issue
18
Year of publication
1999
Pages
3562 - 3568
Database
ISI
SICI code
1089-5639(19990506)103:18<3562:GPFEOF>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The gas phase free energies of formation of the C-alpha-centered radicals o f methanol (0.1 kJ mol(-1)), ethanol (-11.2 kJ mol(-1)), 1-propanol (-1.8 k J mol(-1)), and 3-propanol (-23.2 kJ mol(-1)) were derived from a combinati on of experimental data and theoretical procedures. Enthalpies of formation were taken from experiment or derived from Delta(f)H degrees((g)) of the p arent alcohols and theoretical BDEs (radicals of 1- and 2-propanol). Entrop ies were obtained from B3LYP/6-31G(D) geometries and vibrational frequencie s, and the rigid rotator harmonic oscillator approximation, taking account of the conformational mix of the free radicals. These results were combined with experimental free energies of formation in water to yield free energi es of solution. The BOSS Monte Carlo discrete solution simulation package, combined with quantum mechanical calculations (QM+BOSS), was used to derive free energies of solution of the C-alpha-centered free radicals of methano l, ethanol, 1-propanol, and 2-propanol in water. The absolute free energies of solution are quantitatively described by QM+BOSS with TIP4P water (in k J mol(-1)): methanol radical, expt -17.3, calc -16.2; ethanol radical, expt -11.8, calc -12.3; 2-propanol radical, expt -12.3, calc -13.3. A value is predicted for the I-propanol radical, -15.4 kJ mol(-1). The results are not sensitive to the choice of Lennard-Jones parameters for the radical center . The recommended procedure involves geometry optimization and frequencies at the B3LYP/6-31G(D) level in the gas phase, followed by a single paint SC RF-SCIPCM calculation to obtain CHELPG charges. Omission of the SCRF step y ields free energies of solution that are too low compared to experiment. Th e radicals are less solvated than the parent alcohols. Examination of the C HELPG charges suggests that the reason lies in the lower polarity of the C- O bond and lower H-bond acceptor ability of the oxygen atom.