Cart we change other people without changing ourselves as well? To test thi
s question, participants used one of three techniques-door-in-the-face, aut
horitative influence, and rational arguments-to convince a confederate to a
ttend a campus meeting that favored an issue opposed by the confederate, bu
t supported by the subject. Following the confederate's compliance, partici
pants evaluated their perceptions of their performance and the performance
of the confederate. Participants using rational arguments described themsel
ves as intelligent and friendly, participants using authoritative influence
described themselves as dominant and unfriendly, and participants using do
or-in-the-face described themselves as submissive. As predicted from an ear
lier study (O'Neal, Kipnis, & Craig, 1994), the use of the three influence
techniques also caused systematic changes in participants' evaluations of t
he target. Because the use of certain behavior techniques (e.g., controllin
g, deceptive) can cause users to devalue themselves and others, it is recom
mended that ethical safeguards governing the use of these techniques should
be considered.