The relationship between endogenous gibberellins and resetting in Eustoma grandiflorum

Citation
T. Hisamatsu et al., The relationship between endogenous gibberellins and resetting in Eustoma grandiflorum, J JPN S HOR, 68(3), 1999, pp. 527-533
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00137626 → ACNP
Volume
68
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
527 - 533
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-7626(199905)68:3<527:TRBEGA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Treatments with gibberellin A(1)(GA(1)), GA(3) and GA(20) promoted stem elo ngation in rosetted seedlings of Eustoma grandiflorum in the following orde r: GA(1) = GA(3)> GA(20), whereas entkaurene (K), ent- kaurenoic acid (KA) and GA(19) did not. GA(1), GA(3), GA(19) and GA(20) treatments promoted lea f elongation in the order of GA(1) = GA(3) = GA(20) > GA(19), although K an d KA did not. Quantitative analysis of endogenous GAs suggested that GA-bio synthesis pathway prior to GA(53) might be blocked in the rosetted plants. Furthermore, the results of stem and leaf elongation by the GA treatment in dicate that there was a difference in 20- oxidase activity between stem and leaves of rosetted plants. Quantitative analyses also provided evidence th at there were tissue- specific 20 -oxidase activities not only in the roset ted plants but also in the non-rosetted plants of E. grandiflorum. GA(3)-in duced stem elongation, but not floral initiation in rosetted plants under 3 5 degrees/30 degrees C. Uniconazole (UCZ) inhibited leaf expansion, stem el ongation and flower bud development of the non-rosetted plants, but did not inhibit flower bud initiation. These results indicate that leaf expansion, stem elongation and flower bud development are apparently GA-dependent but flower bud initiation is not.