COMPARISON OF 2 MODELS OF AGGREGATION IN CONTINENTAL-SHELF BOTTOM BOUNDARY-LAYERS

Citation
Ps. Hill et Arm. Nowell, COMPARISON OF 2 MODELS OF AGGREGATION IN CONTINENTAL-SHELF BOTTOM BOUNDARY-LAYERS, J GEO RES-O, 100(C11), 1995, pp. 22749-22763
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Oceanografhy
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
ISSN journal
21699275 → ACNP
Volume
100
Issue
C11
Year of publication
1995
Pages
22749 - 22763
Database
ISI
SICI code
2169-9275(1995)100:C11<22749:CO2MOA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Comparison of two models of aggregation and disaggregation of fine sed iment in continental-shelf bottom boundary layers delineates condition s under which these processes can be modeled simply. Model 1 predicts the evolution of the particle size distribution based on layer-average d mean sediment concentrations. Model 2 avoids the simplifying assumpt ions of model 1 by representing suspension dynamics with a Monte Carlo simulation of the joint probability density function of number concen tration in the various particle size classes. In contrast to model 1, this technique bases aggregation rates on local concentrations and exp licitly treats the effect of concentration correlations on aggregation rates. Each model produces a time series of particle size distributio n in a steady, horizontally uniform, nondepositing, continental-shelf bottom boundary layer. Comparisons are made for suspensions that are i nitially polydisperse and monodisperse, for shear velocities of 0.01 a nd 0.005 m s(-1), for fractal dimensions of 1.92 and 2.4, for initial layer-averaged sediment concentrations of 1, 2.5, 10, and 25 x 10(-3) kg m(-3), and for sticking efficiencies of 0.1 and 1.0. In general, mo del 1 is accurate for suspensions that are initially polydisperse and do not develop strong vertical structure. Results suggest that as long as maximal settling velocity does not exceed roughly 0.6u, vertical gradients in sediment concentration do not degrade substantially the a ccuracy of layer-averaged mean models for concentrations typical of th e continental shelf. When initial suspensions are monodisperse and/or vertical gradients are large, transport-limited aggregation can slow o verall aggregation rates of model 2 relative to model 1, or important interactions can occur between particle types that both show strong ve rtical structure, speeding overall aggregation rates in model 2. In th e future the effects on the accuracy of layer-averaged mean models of short- and long-term unsteadiness, erosion, and deposition will be exp lored.