Kk. Jindal, Management of idiopathic crescentic and diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis: Evidence-based recommendations, KIDNEY INT, 55, 1999, pp. S33-S40
Idiopathic crescentic glomerulonephritis (GN) often presents with a rapid l
oss of renal function and pathology showing extensive crescent formation. T
he disease is caused by different immunopathogenetic mechanisms, pauci-immu
ne, often antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive microvasculit
is, antiglomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibody disease, and immune com
plex formation. Historical reviews reveal poor renal prognosis, even after
treatment with oral steroids and cytotoxic drugs. Prognosis has improved in
the last decade. In this article, evidence-based recommendations for manag
ement are presented. Because of the high risk of end-stage renal disease (E
SRD), early aggressive therapy is recommended, despite weak supporting evid
ence. Treatment for anti-GEM antibody-induced crescentic GN should be initi
ated early and should include pulse methylprednisolone, a two-week course o
f plasmapheresis and two months of treatment with corticosteroids and cyclo
phosphamide (grade B and C). Treatment for pauci-immune crescentic GN shoul
d be pulse methylprednisolone, followed by oral corticosteroids and cycloph
osphamide for 6 to 12 months (grade B). Recurrences can be managed similarl
y (grade B), along with appropriate supportive therapy. In patients who dev
elop ESRD, successful transplantation can be performed. Diffuse endocapilla
ry proliferative GN is classically postinfectious. It generally has a good
prognosis when no crescent formation occurs. Adult patients with persistent
proteinuria, hypertension, and renal function impairment need careful foll
ow-up and management to modify progressive hemodynamic injury.