The anti-emetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron mesilate plus dexamethasone versus intravenous dolasetron mesilate alone in patients receiving fractionated chemotherapy
Aa. Fauser et al., The anti-emetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron mesilate plus dexamethasone versus intravenous dolasetron mesilate alone in patients receiving fractionated chemotherapy, ONKOLOGIE, 22(2), 1999, pp. 140-144
Purpose: Fractionated cisplatin-containing regimens are routinely used for
chemotherapy of certain types of cancer: Dolasetron has been shown to be ef
fective in preventing,acute emesis related to cisplatin chemotherapy over 2
4 h; its effectiveness has not been evaluated in fractionated cisplatin-con
taining chemotherapy. This trial assesses the efficacy of dolasetron alone
or dolasetron plus dexamethasone in preventing nausea and vomiting related
to fractionated cisplatin chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: 96 hospitaliz
ed cancer patients were randomized to receive 100 mg i.v. dolasetron or 100
mg i.v. dolasetron + 20 mg dexamethasone before chemotherapy primarily wit
h cisplatin (15-50 mg/m(2)) infused over less than or equal to 4 h for at l
east 2 but not more than 5 consecutive days. Dolasetron was administered to
all patients 30 min before chemotherapy. Dexamethasone or placebo was admi
nistered in double-blind fashion 5 min before chemotherapy. Efficacy was me
asured at hour 24 of each study day using complete response (no vomiting an
d no rescue medication) and maximum nausea severity, self-assessed by patie
nts using a 100-mm visual analogue scald. Results: Overall complete respons
e rates were significantly higher in the dolasetron pins dexamethasone grou
p compared with the dolasetron-only group (p < 0.003, Fisher's exact test).
Complete response rates on study days 1 and 2 were also significantly high
er with dolasetron plus dexamethasone than with dolasetron alone (day 1: 98
vs. 70%, p = 0.0290; day 2: 89 vs. 62%, p = 0.0286 by Fisher's exact test)
. Test results were not significant on days 3-5 due to the small number of
patients (day 3: n = 37, day 4: n = 32; day 5: n = 24). Treatment and locat
ion of the primary tumor exerted the only statistically Significant effects
on complete response (treatment: p = 0.006; location of primary tumor: p =
0.021 by log linear analysis of contingency tables). Both treatments were
administered safely. Conclusion: As seen with other 5-HT3 receptor antagoni
st antiemetics, the addition of dexamethasone to dolasetron significantly i
ncreases effectiveness in preventing nausea and vomiting related to fractio
nated cisplatin chemotherapy. Both dolasetron and dolasetron plus dexametha
sone were well tolerated.