F. Lucas et A. Sclafani, Differential reinforcing and satiating effects of intragastric fat and carbohydrate infusions in rats, PHYSL BEHAV, 66(3), 1999, pp. 381-388
Food intake and preferences are modulated by the postingestive satiating an
d reinforcing actions of nutrients. This experiment compared the feeding ef
fects of isocaloric intragastric (i.g.) carbohydrate (maltodextrin) and fat
(corn oil) infusions in food-restricted rats fed low-fat (12% fat kcal) or
high-fat (48% fat kcal) diets. In Experiment 1, the rats were given one fl
avored saccharin solution (CS+C) paired with i.g. carbohydrate infusions, a
second flavor (CS+F) paired with i.g, fat infusions, and a third flavor (C
S-) paired with i.g. water infusions during 30-min one-bottle training sess
ions. In subsequent two-bottle tests, the rats preferred both CS+s to the C
S- (68-83%) and the CS+C to the CS+F (68-70%). In Experiment 2, the feeding
inhibitory effects of the nutrient infusions on an ongoing meal (satiation
test) or a subsequent meal (satiety test) were compared. The intake of a p
alatable Polycose+saccharin solution was suppressed by a concurrent carbohy
drate infusion but not by a fat infusion. Also, i.g. carbohydrate preloads
suppressed the intake of a subsequent (30-180 min) mixed carbohydrate+fat t
est meal more than did i.g. fat preloads. The satiety effects of the fat pr
eloads were more pronounced in rats fed the low-fat diet than in rats fed t
he high-fat maintenance diet. Diet composition did not reliably influence t
he preference conditioning and satiation effects of the nutrient infusions.
These results confirm prior reports that fat is less satiating than carboh
ydrate, and further demonstrate that i.g. carbohydrate infusions condition
a stronger flavor preference than fat infusions. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science
Inc.