Although the killing of dependent infants by adult males is a widespread ph
enomenon among primates, its causes and consequences still remain hotly deb
ated. According to the sexual selection hypothesis, infanticidal males will
gain a reproductive advantage provided that only unrelated infants are kil
led and that the males increase their chances of siring the next infants. A
lternatively the social pathology hypothesis interprets infanticide as a re
sult of crowded living conditions and, thus, as not providing any advantage
. Based on DNA analyses of wild Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) we pre
sent the first evidence that male attackers were not related to their infan
t victims. Furthermore, in all cases the presumed killers were the likely f
athers of the subsequent infants. Our data, therefore, strongly support the
sexual selection hypothesis interpreting infanticide as an evolved, adapti
ve male reproductive tactic.