HIGH-DOSE CHLORAMBUCIL VERSUS BINET MODIFIED CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, VINCRISTINE, AND PREDNISONE REGIMEN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED B-CELL CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA - RESULTS OF AN INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL
B. Jaksic et al., HIGH-DOSE CHLORAMBUCIL VERSUS BINET MODIFIED CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, VINCRISTINE, AND PREDNISONE REGIMEN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED B-CELL CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA - RESULTS OF AN INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL, Cancer, 79(11), 1997, pp. 2107-2114
BACKGROUND. In recent years, much attention has been paid to the possi
ble efficacy of intensive chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced, p
rogressive B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. For thi
s reason, the International Society for Chemo-Immunotherapy, Chronic L
ymphocytic Leukemia Cooperative Group, has begun a randomized multicen
ter trial comparing Binet's modified cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vi
ncristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen with continuous high dose chl
orambucil (HD-CLB). METHODS. During the period January 1987 to May 199
3, 228 previously untreated CLL patients from 7 cooperative institutio
ns were randomized to this trial. Advanced and/or progressive disease
was defined by high Total Tumor Mass (TTM) score (>9), and/or short do
ubling time (DT) (<12 months), and/or bone marrow failure. The respons
e to therapy was defined by reduction of the initial TTM score. The en
d points of the trial were response rate, survival, and toxicity. RESU
LTS. HD-CLB resulted in a higher response rate than CHOP in evaluable
cases, with 89.5% overall responses (complete response + partial respo
nse) versus 75%, respectively (P < 0.001). At the time of an analysis
performed in July 1995 (after a median follow-up period of 37 months),
overall survival was also longer in the HD-CLB treatment arm (median
survival, 08 months) than in the CHOP treatment arm (median survival,
47 months) (P < 0.005). Toxicity was acceptable and comparable in the
two treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS. The current study showed that HD-CLB
is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients wit
h advanced and/or progressive CLL. Therefore, the authors recommend it
s wider use, possibly in comparison with and/or in combination with ne
w therapeutic agents, such as purine analogues. (C) 1997 American Canc
er Society.