Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania

Citation
Tj. Swimley et al., Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania, WILDL SOC B, 26(4), 1998, pp. 836-845
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
ISSN journal
00917648 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
836 - 845
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-7648(199824)26:4<836:PROLSI>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Detecting river otter (Lontra canadensis) presence or estimating abundance relies on harvest records, trapper surveys, track surveys, or latrine surve ys. Harvest records and trapper surveys are not an option where otters are protected, and track surveys have limited utility in many areas. Latrine su rveys are often useful, but may be labor intensive. We used multivariate an alysis techniques to examine habitat characteristics at 131 river otter lat rines and 113 randomly chosen (nonlatrine) sites along upper Pine Creek, no rthcentral Pennsylvania, 1991-1992. Discriminant analysis and logistic regr ession each identified 6 variables as predictors of otter latrine sites: ve rtical banks, rock formations, points of land, backwater sloughs, tributary streams, and beaver (Castor canadensis) bank dens, lodges, or ponds. Model s were cross-validated with ground surveys and low-altitude aerial photogra phs (1:1,300) from lower Pine Creek, 1993-1994, and Tionesta Creek, northwe stern Pennsylvania, 1993-1994. We developed a pattern recognition (PATREC) model using the 6 variables identified as predictors of river otter latrine s. Results were similar for all 3 model types, but differed among the 3 sur vey areas. All 3 model types showed potential for identifying latrines. All ocation of resources to detect otter presence can be adjusted by varying th e cutpoint P(E), that defines a predicted latrine for both the logistic reg ression and the PATREC models.