Lack of variation in alpha gal expression on lymphocytes in miniature swine of different genotypes

Citation
Sj. Chae et al., Lack of variation in alpha gal expression on lymphocytes in miniature swine of different genotypes, XENOTRANSPL, 6(1), 1999, pp. 43-51
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
XENOTRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
0908665X → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
43 - 51
Database
ISI
SICI code
0908-665X(199902)6:1<43:LOVIAG>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background: Gal alpha l-3Gal epitopes (alpha Gal) have been demonstrated to be present on tissues of all pig breeds tested to-date and are the major t arget for human anti-alpha galactosyl (alpha Gal) antibodies. We investigat ed members of an MHC-inbred miniature swine herd to assess whether there wa s an association between genotype and expression of aGal. Identification of a low expressor genotype would potentially enable selective breeding of pi gs that might prove beneficial as donors in clinical xenotransplantation. M ethods: we measured alpha Gal expression on various pig cells by use of flu orescent-activate cell sorter (FACS) using (i) purified human anti-alpha Ga l antibody and (ii) the isolectin GS-I-B4. Initial studies were on porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and subsequent studies on lympho cytes, platelets, and T cell subsets (CD4 + and CD8 + cells). Results: ther e was considerable day-to-day variation in alpha Gal expression on PBMCs fr om the same pig. When only lymphocytes were examined, there was a high degr ee of reproducibility, and no significant difference in alpha Gal expressio n was detected between representative pairs of animlas of three different g enotypes. Purified anti alpha Gal antibody bound to different sites on the alpha Gal epitope than did Griffonia (Bandeiraea) simplicifolia I-B4 (GS-I- B4). Lectin binding was significantly reduced in the absence of divalent ca tions. When CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were examined for alpha Gal expression, two distinct populations of each type of cell were observed, with larger c ells expressing a higher level of aGal. Conclusions: although the number of pigs of different genotypes studied was small, on the basis of this limite d study, pigs of a low aGal expressor genotype that could be selectively br ed for use in clinical xenotransplantation were not identified.