A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled field trial to determine the efficacy and safety of Malarone (R) (atovaquone/proguanil) for the prophylaxis of malaria in Zambia
Ty. Sukwa et al., A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled field trial to determine the efficacy and safety of Malarone (R) (atovaquone/proguanil) for the prophylaxis of malaria in Zambia, AM J TROP M, 60(4), 1999, pp. 521-525
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Malaria poses a major health risk to people who are exposed to infection in
malaria-endemic areas. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled stud
y was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of Malarone(TM) (250 m
g of atovaquone/100 mg of proguanil hydrochloride per tablet) for the chemo
prophylaxis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zambia. Adult volunteers re
ceived a three-day treatment course of Malarone to eliminate pre-existing p
arasitemia and were then immediately randomized to treatment with either on
e Malarone tablet daily (n = 136), or one placebo tablet daily (n = 138) fo
r at least 10 weeks. Malaria blood smears were prepared on a weekly basis a
nd a failure of chemoprophylaxis was defined as any subject who had a posit
ive blood smear, or who withdrew from the study due to a treatment-related
adverse event. The prophylaxis success rates in the Malarone and placebo gr
oups were 98% and 63%, respectively (P < 0.001). The most commonly reported
adverse events with at least a possible causal relationship to study medic
ation were headache and abdominal pain, which occurred with a higher incide
nce in the placebo group. No subjects were withdrawn from the study due to
a treatment-related adverse event. Thus, Malarone appears to have an excell
ent safety and efficacy profile fur the chemoprophylaxis of P. falciparum i
nfection.