PRETEENAGE DRUG-USE IN AUSTRALIA - THE KEY PREDICTORS AND SCHOOL-BASED DRUG-EDUCATION

Authors
Citation
G. Hawthorne, PRETEENAGE DRUG-USE IN AUSTRALIA - THE KEY PREDICTORS AND SCHOOL-BASED DRUG-EDUCATION, Journal of adolescent health, 20(5), 1997, pp. 384-395
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
1054139X
Volume
20
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
384 - 395
Database
ISI
SICI code
1054-139X(1997)20:5<384:PDIA-T>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Purpose: The promise that early intervention school-based drug educati on is it will have public health benefits. This argument was explored through identifying the key predictors of early adolescent social drug use. Methods: A cross-sectional sun ey involving 3,019 6th year stude nts, aged 11-12 years (participation rate: 99%), enrolled in 86 Melbou rne primary schools was carried out to determine students' social drug use. In addition data were collected on known key social, personal, a nd educational predictors. Logistic regression was used to identify si gnificant predictors of drug experimentation and use. Results: The key predictors of girls' tobacco use were friends' smoking (OR: 6.7), low literacy (OR: 4.4), and alcohol use (OR: 3.9). For boys they were fri ends' smoking (OR: 8.6), low literacy (OR: 4.2), and alcohol use (OR: 3.1). For alcohol use, the key predictors for girls were smoking (OR: 4.2), parents' drinking (OR: 3.9), and friends' drinking (OR: 3.8). Fo r boys they were friends' drinking (OR: 3.3), smoking (OR: 2.8), and p oor literacy (OR: 2.6). Regarding analgesic use, for girls the key pre dictors were alcohol use (OR: 3.3), analgesic self-administration (OR: 2.4), and parents' drinking or working as tradespersons/laborers (OR: 1.7, respectively). For boys they were analgesic self-administration (OR: 2.5), drinking (OR: 1.9), or smoking (OR: 1.7). Conclusions: The key predictors of social drug use-which suggests multiple recruitment pathways-were all outside the ambit of drug education programs. The im pact of education on recruitment to drug use or experimentation among the young is therefore likely to be slight. (C) Society for Adolesce,n t Medicine, 1996.