Cisplatin in combination with irinotecan in the treatment of patients withmalignant pleural mesothelioma - A pilot phase II clinical trial and pharmacokinetic profile
T. Nakano et al., Cisplatin in combination with irinotecan in the treatment of patients withmalignant pleural mesothelioma - A pilot phase II clinical trial and pharmacokinetic profile, CANCER, 85(11), 1999, pp. 2375-2384
BACKGROUND. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxici
ty of a combination of cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment o
f patients (SN-38).
METHODS, Fifteen previously untreated patients with malignant pleural mesot
helioma were treated with cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) on Day 1) and CPT-11 (60 mg
/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15) administered intravenously and followed by a 1-
week rest period. The course of treatment was repeated every 28 days. After
intravenous administration, the levels of CPT-11 and SN-38 in the plasma a
nd pleural fluid were determined for each histologic subtype of mesotheliom
a.
RESULTS, All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Four partia
l responses (response rate of 26.7%) with a median response duration of 25.
9 weeks and 2 regressions of evaluable disease (overall response rate of 40
%) were observed. The median survival time after chemotherapy was 28.3 week
s, and the median time to treatment failure was 22.1 weeks. The 1-year surv
ival rate for all patients was 38.5%. Toxicity was well tolerated, and ther
e were no treatment-related deaths. World Health Organization Grade 3 leuko
penia occurred in 3 patients (20%), and Grade 1 or 2 diarrhea occurred in 3
patients (20%). There was no excess toxicity in patients with large pleura
l effusions compared with those with no pleural effusions. CPT-11 and SN-38
were detected in the pleural fluid 1 hour after intravenous administration
. The maximum concentrations of CPT-11 and SN-38 in the pleural fluid were
36.5% and 75.8%, respectively, of the corresponding plasma values.
CONCLUSIONS, The combination of cisplatin and CPT-11 had definite activity
against malignant pleural mesothelioma and was well tolerated. The intraven
ous administration of CPT-11 produced adequate distribution of CPT-11 and i
ts active metabolite SN-38 into the pleural fluid and allowed a higher conc
entration of the more active SN-38 to make contact with mesothelioma cells
in the thoracic cavity. These results warrant further clinical evaluation o
f this combination chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant pleural meso
thelioma in a confirmatory Phase II trial.