Pharmacokinetics and biotransformations of oxaliplatin in comparison with ormaplatin following a single bolus intravenous injection in rats

Citation
Fr. Luo et al., Pharmacokinetics and biotransformations of oxaliplatin in comparison with ormaplatin following a single bolus intravenous injection in rats, CANC CHEMOT, 44(1), 1999, pp. 19-28
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
03445704 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
19 - 28
Database
ISI
SICI code
0344-5704(199907)44:1<19:PABOOI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Purpose: Traditionally ultrafilterable Pt has been used to estimate the bod y exposure to platinum drugs. However, previous studies have shown that ult rafilterable Pt consists of both cytotoxic and inert biotransformation prod ucts of platinum drugs. Therefore, it has been proposed that pharmacokineti c parameters of the parent drug and its cytotoxic biotransformation product s are more likely to be correlated with the drug toxicity and efficacy than those of ultrafilterable Pt. Oxaliplatin and ormaplatin are likely to form very similar biotransformation products in vivo based on previous studies. However, ormaplatin causes severe and irreversible neurotoxicity while oxa liplatin causes moderate and reversible neurotoxicity. To evaluate the hypo thesis that the neurotoxicity is associated with the pharmacokinetics of ac tive biotransformation products, we investigated the biotransformations and pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and ormaplatin in rats at equimolar doses. Methods: 3H-oxaliplatin and H-3-ormaplatin were administered to Wistar mal e rats through single bolus i.v. injections (20 mu mol/kg). Blood was sampl ed from 3.5 min to 360 min and centrifuged at 2000 g to separate the plasma from red blood cells (RBCs). The RBCs were sonicated and centrifuged at 13 000g to separate the cytosol from the membrane fraction. Both plasma and R BC cytosol were filtered through YMT30 membranes (M-r = 30 000 kDa), and th e ultrafiltrates were analyzed using a single column HPLC technique to iden tify and quantitate the biotransformation products. The pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin, ormaplatin, and their biotransformation products were charact erized utilizing the curve stripping and nonlinear least-squares fitting pr ogram RSTRIP. Results: The decays of total, plasma, plasma ultrafilterable (PUFS, RBC-bound, and plasma protein-bound Pt-dach (only Pt species with an intact dach carrier ligand were quantitated in this study) were described by biphasic curves. No significant kinetic differences between oxaliplatin and ormaplatin were observed for total, plasma, and PUF Pt-dach in the init ial a decay phase. However, Pt-dach bound to plasma proteins fourfold more quickly for ormaplatin than for oxaliplatin, and the AUC for Pt-dach bound to plasma proteins was twofold higher for ormaplatin than for oxaliplatin. The concentration of RBC-bound Pt-dach was highest at the initial time-poin t of 3.5 min for both drugs, which suggested a very rapid RBC uptake. The b inding of Pt-dach to RBCs was slightly greater initially for ormaplatin tha n for oxaliplatin. However, the RBC-bound Pt-dach decayed more rapidly for ormaplatin (t(1/2 alpha RBC) = 5.1 min) than for oxaliplatin (t(1/2 alpha R BC) = 15.3 min). Thus the AUC(RBC) was slightly greater for oxaliplatin tha n for ormaplatin. The AUC was also slightly greater for oxaliplatin than fo r ormaplatin for the Pt-dach associated with the RBC membrane and RBC cytos olic proteins. However, there was no significant difference between oxalipl atin and ormaplatin for Pt-dach in the RBC cytosolic ultrafiltrate. There w as also no significant difference in the AUC(PUf) between oxaliplatin and o rmaplatin. Both oxaliplatin and ormaplatin produced the same types of major plasma biotransformation products including Pt(dach)Cl-2, Pt(dach)(Cys)(2) , Pt(dach)(GSH)(2), Pt(dach)(GSH), Pt(dach)(Met), and free dach. The decays of oxaliplatin, ormaplatin, and their biotransformation products were desc ribed by biphasic curves. The C-max and AUC were 19- and 15-fold higher, re spectively, for oxaliplatin than for ormaplatin. However, the C-max and AUC were 29- and 16-fold less for Pt(dach)Cl-2, deri ved from oxaliplatin than for that derived from ormaplatin. No significant differences were observed among the C-max values and AUC values for the oth er plasma biotransformation products. Pt-dach species formed in RBCs were a lso identified and quantitated. Oxaliplatin was observed in the RBC cytosol , while no ormaplatin was found. The same types of major RBC biotransformat ion products were observed including Pt(dach)Cl-2, Pt(dach)(Cys)(2), Pt(dac h)(GSW), Pt(dach) (GSH)?, and free dach. Among these Pt-dach species, Pt(da ch)Cl-2 was present at a twofold lower concentration initially but persiste d longer for oxaliplatin than for ormaplatin. while the other RBC biotransf ormation products behaved kinetically similarly and no significant AUC diff erences were observed. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the different to xicity and efficacy profiles between oxaliplatin and ormaplatin may be rela ted to the different pharmacokinetic features of these two drugs, especiall y the different plasma concentrations of their common biotransformation pro duct Pt(dach)Cl-2. This in turn suggests that Pt(dach)Cl-2 and its hydrolys is products may be uniquely neurotoxic.