Sb. Duffull et al., Development of a general method of limited sampling for the determination of AUC for a drug that displays two-compartment pharmacokinetics, EUR J CL PH, 55(3), 1999, pp. 213-219
Objectives: To develop a method of limited sampling that would enable accur
ate estimation of the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) when us
ing the log trapezoidal method.
Methods: A series of datasets were simulated. Each dataset comprised 1000 s
ubjects. Each subject was "administered" an intravenous bolus dose of a dru
g that displays two compartment pharmacokinetics. In the first series of si
mulations, a variety of combinations of the number of sampling times (K) an
d number of replicate measurements (R) at each of these times were tested,
where K x R = 12 (i.e. N = 12). The times that each of the K samples were t
aken were chosen to be those that divided the AUC into K - 1 trapezoids of
equal area. The concentration-time curves were estimated based on a priori
estimates of the population parameters. The best combination of K and R was
tested under various conditions of parameter variability and assay variabi
lity. The combinations were compared with a conventional sampling strategy,
where N = 12, K = 12(R = 1).
Results: The combination K = 4 and R = 3 proved to be the "best". It had si
milar accuracy to the conventional method. The best limited sampling combin
ation was superior to the conventional method when assay variability was hi
gh (CV = 30%), was similar when assay variability was 15%, but the conventi
onal method became statistically superior when assay variability was 7.5% o
r less. The accuracy of the best limited sampling combination was inversely
related to the parameter variability. If K was set to 4 and R allowed to i
ncrease to 6 (i.e. N not equal 12), there was no further gain in accuracy.
Conclusion: The proposed method of limited sampling is at least as accurate
as the conventional intensive sampling technique, but more efficient in te
rms of sampling.