The relative role of the Child-Pugh classification and the Mayo natural history model in the assessment of survival in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis
Wr. Kim et al., The relative role of the Child-Pugh classification and the Mayo natural history model in the assessment of survival in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, HEPATOLOGY, 29(6), 1999, pp. 1643-1648
The Child-Pugh classification is a simple, convenient prognostic measure in
patients with liver cirrhosis. We investigated the relative role of the Ch
ild-Pugh classification and the Mayo model in the assessment of survival in
patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Of the 173 patients de
scribed in the original Mayo PSC natural history model, 147 patients had su
fficient information in the medical record to allow computation of the Chil
d-Pugh score. We used our most recent modification of the Mayo model to com
pute the risk score, based on patient's age, serum levels of bilirubin, alb
umin, and aspartate aminotransferase and history of variceal bleeding. Usin
g the risk score (R), patients were divided into the low- (R < 0), intermed
iate- (0 less than or equal to R < 2), and high-risk (R greater than or equ
al to 2) groups. Kaplan-Meier estimates and proportional hazards analysis w
ere used to evaluate the two prognostic models. Although there was a statis
tically significant correlation between the Child-Pugh and Mayo risk scores
, two-thirds of the patients had a Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6 and a relativ
ely wide range of risk scores (-1.1-4.3). The probability of survival for 7
years in patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 92%
, 74%, and 40% for Child-Pugh class A (n = 96) and 100%, 62%, and 28% for C
hild-Pugh class B patients (n = 44), respectively. There were only a small
number (n 7) of Child-Pugh class C patients. In our age-adjusted multivaria
te analysis, each unit increase in the Mayo risk score was associated with
a 2.5-fold increase in the risk of death (95% confidence interval: 1.8-3.4,
P < .01), whereas Child-Pugh classification had no significant impact on s
urvival (Child-Pugh B vs. A: risk ratio = 1.1 [95% confidence interval: 0.6
-2.0]; Child-Pugh C versus A: risk ratio = 0.6 [95% confidence interval: 0.
2-1.8]). In contrast to the Child-Pugh classification, which was developed
for advanced liver cirrhosis, the Mayo model provides valid survival inform
ation, particularly in patients early in the course of PSC.