NMRD assessment of Gd-DTPA-bis(methoxyethylamide), (Gd-DTPA-BMEA), a nonionic MRI agent

Citation
K. Adzamli et al., NMRD assessment of Gd-DTPA-bis(methoxyethylamide), (Gd-DTPA-BMEA), a nonionic MRI agent, INV RADIOL, 34(6), 1999, pp. 410-414
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00209996 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
410 - 414
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-9996(199906)34:6<410:NAOG(A>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Gd-DTPA-BMEA, a nonionic bis(methoxycthylamide) d erivative of Gd-DTPA, is the active ingredient of OptiMARK,(R) now awaiting FDA approval. In this study, we compare the relaxivities of Gd-DTPA-BMEA ( OptiMARK(R)) with those of the commercially available DTPA-based agents Gd- DTPA(2-) (Magnevist(R)) and Gd-DTPA-EMA (Omniscan(R)) at different held str engths (1/T-1 nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion (NMRD) profiles). In a ddition, we study how changes in structural attributes of small paramagneti c chelate complexes of Gd3+ ions influence 1/T-1 NMRD profiles. METHODS. 1/T-1 NMRD profiles of Gd-DTPA-EMEA (OptiMARK(R)) were measured at 5 degrees and 35 degrees C and a set of values for the parameters that des cribe relaxation by Gd3+-proton magnetic dipolar interactions was obtained. The rotational (tau(R)) and the diffusional (tau(D)) correlation times for Gd-DTPA-BMA were adjusted for the 15% greater molecular weight of Gd-DTPA- BMEA, tau(M) (the resident lifetime of Gd3+-bound water) was obtained from available O-17 NMR relaxation data. For tau(SO) and tau(V) (the low-field r elaxation time of the Gd3+ moment and its correlation time), the Gd-DTPA-BM A values were taken as initial values and tau(SO) refined as needed. RESULTS. Although, at 35 degrees C, tau(M) is comparable for the two neutra l agents and an order of magnitude longer than that for Gd-DTPA(2-), the VT , NMRD profiles of Gd-DTPA-BMEA are indistinguishable from those of Gd-DTPA (2-) and Gd-DTPA-BMA. A 40% increase in the value of tau(SO) from Gd-DTPA(2 -) is required for agreement of data and theory for Gd-DTPA-BMEA. CONCLUSIONS. Based on their 1/T-1 NMRD profiles, the efficacy of the three agents should be identical in typical clinical MRI applications. The data c an be fit reliably to theory, and differences in the fit parameters (and st ructure) have no effect on the three profiles at 35 degrees C. The relative ly long values of tau(M) for the two neutral agents mould only be of import ance at low temperatures.