Jm. Groh et al., HOW IS A SENSORY MAP READ-OUT - EFFECTS OF MICROSTIMULATION IN VISUALAREA MT ON SACCADES AND SMOOTH-PURSUIT EYE-MOVEMENTS, The Journal of neuroscience, 17(11), 1997, pp. 4312-4330
To generate behavioral responses based on sensory input, motor areas o
f the brain must interpret, or ''read out,'' signals from sensory maps
. Our experiments tested several algorithms for how the motor systems
for smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements might extract a usable s
ignal of target velocity from the distributed representation of veloci
ty in the middle temporal visual area (MT or V5). Using microstimulati
on, we attempted to manipulate the velocity information within MT whil
e monkeys tracked a moving visual stimulus. We examined the effects of
the microstimulation on smooth pursuit and on the compensation for ta
rget velocity shown by saccadic eye movements. Microstimulation could
alter both the speed and direction of the motion estimates of both typ
es of eye movements and could also cause monkeys to generate pursuit e
ven when the visual target was actually stationary. The pattern of alt
erations suggests that microstimulation can introduce an additional ve
locity signal into MT and that the pursuit and saccadic systems usuall
y compute a vector average of the visually evoked and microstimulation
-induced velocity signals (pursuit, 55 of 122 experiments; saccades, 7
0 of 122). Microstimulation effects in a few experiments were consiste
nt with vector summation of these two signals (pursuit, 6 of 122, sacc
ades, 2 of 122). In the remainder of the experiments, microstimulation
caused either an apparent impairment in motion processing (pursuit, 4
7 of 122; saccades, 41 of 122) or had no effect (pursuit, 14 of 122; s
accades, 9 of 122). Within individual experiments, the effects on purs
uit and saccades were usually similar, but the occasional striking exc
eption suggests that the two eye movement systems may perform motion c
omputations somewhat independently.