Laboratory studies of conditioned anxiety using a between-subjects group de
sign typically involve only one session of conditioning trials. Because res
earch suggests that anxiety disorders develop and change with repeated expo
sure to aversive events, these studies may fail to mimic the developmental
course of anxiety in the natural environment. We highlight the limitations
of single-session studies for examining the development of conditioned anxi
ety within individual participants and discuss how many of these limitation
s can be avoided using single-subject designs. Furthermore, we suggest that
the most comprehensive account of anxiety can be attained by using a singl
e-subject design in conjunction with more commonly used group designs. (C)
1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.