W. Foissner et S. Agatha, Morphology and Morphogenesis of Metopus hasei Sondheim, 1929 and M-inversus (Jankowski, 1964) nov Comb. (Ciliophora, Metopida), J EUKAR MIC, 46(2), 1999, pp. 174-193
The morphology and morphogenesis of Metopus hasei Sondheim, 1929 and M. inv
ersus (Jankowski, 1964) n. comb. were investigated using live observation,
silver impregnation, and scanning electron microscopy. Metopus has a spiral
body organization and the ventral margin of the preoral dome bears five sp
ecialized ciliary rows, that form the so-called perizonal stripe. Division
is homothetogenic, occurs in freely motile (i. e. non-encysted) condition,
and includes a partial reorganization of the parental oral apparatus. Durin
g division, the complicated cell shape becomes ellipsoidal and all ciliary
rows arrange meridionally, Stomatogenesis is entirely somatic (congruent to
pleurotelokinetal) and commences with the formation of kinetofragments in
some dorsolateral kinetics. The fragments become the opisthe's adoral membr
anelles, while the paroral membrane is generated by the left two perizonal
ciliary rous, which proliferate kinetids intrakinetally. The perizonal stri
pe of the opisthe is generated by the three right parental perizonal kineti
cs, which divide, and by two dorsolateral ciliary rows, which are added. Th
e morphogenetic processes. especially the unique mode of formation of the p
aroral membrane, are used to define the order Metopida Jankowski, 1980 n. s
tat. more properly. The ontogenetic, ultrastructural, and sequence data ava
ilable give no clear indication about metopid phylogeny, but definitely exc
lude metopids from the classical hetetotrishs, with which they were classif
ied for more than 100 years. Accordingly. we place the Metopida as incertae
sedis in the subphylum Intramacronucleata Lynn. 1996.