A model function for the ocean-normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations

Citation
Fj. Wentz et Dk. Smith, A model function for the ocean-normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations, J GEO RES-O, 104(C5), 1999, pp. 11499-11514
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
ISSN journal
21699275 → ACNP
Volume
104
Issue
C5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
11499 - 11514
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-0227(19990515)104:C5<11499:AMFFTO>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
A model for the ocean surface normalized radar cross section sigma(o) is de rived from 3 months of NASA scatterometer (NSCAT) observations (September 1 5 to December 18, 1996). The model expresses sigma(o) as a function of wind speed, relative wind direction, incidence angle, and polarization. The dep endence of sigma(o) on wind speed is based on collocated special sensor mic rowave/imager (SSM/I) satellite wind retrievals and European Centre for Med ium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model winds. We find that at low winds (< 5 ms(-1)), the SSM/I winds are more reliable than ECWMF, probably owing to small location errors in the ECMWF wind features. The primary wind direc tion dependence of sigma(o) (i.e., the second harmonic) is found from histo grams of the sigma(o) difference between the forward and aft antennas. The sigma(o) versus wind speed relationship is adjusted for cross-swath inciden ce angle differences and is then incorporated into the NSCAT 1 model used t o process the 10-month (September 15, 1996, to June 29, 1997) NSCAT data se t. The resulting NSCAT 1 wind vectors are compared to ECMWF wind fields and buoys. The mean and standard deviation of the NSCAT minus ECMWF (buoy) win d speed difference are 0.05 and 1.78 ms(-1) (-0.29 and 1.26 ms(-1)), respec tively. The wind direction mean and standard deviation differences are 0.8 degrees and 18.5 degrees (7.9 degrees and 15.7 degrees), respectively. The difference between the NSCAT and the ECMWF (buoy) direction exceeds 90 degr ees only 1.1% (1.2%) of the time. We have no explanation for why the buoy w ind directions are biased 8 degrees relative to both NSCAT and ECMWF.