Ethanol fermentation of mixed-sugars using a two-phase, fed-batch process:method to minimize D-glucose repression of Candida shehatae D-xylose fermentations
Jr. Kastner et al., Ethanol fermentation of mixed-sugars using a two-phase, fed-batch process:method to minimize D-glucose repression of Candida shehatae D-xylose fermentations, J IND MIC B, 22(2), 1999, pp. 65-70
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Biotecnology & Applied Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Candida shehatae cells pre-grown on D-xylose simultaneously consumed mixtur
es of D-xylose and D-glucose, under both non-growing (anoxic) and actively
growing conditions (aerobic), to produce ethanol, The rate of D-glucose con
sumption was independent of the D-xylose concentration for cells induced on
D-xylose. However, the D-xylose consumption rate was approximately three t
imes lower than the D-glucose consumption rate at a 50% D-glucose: 50% D-xy
lose mixture. Repression was not observed (substrate utilization rates were
approximately equal) when the percentage of D-glucose and D-xylose was cha
nged to 22% and 78%, respectively. In fermentations with actively growing c
ells (50% glucose and D-xylose), ethanol yields from o-xylose increased, th
e % D-xylose utilized increased, and the xylitol yield was significantly re
duced in the presence of D-glucose, compared to anoxic fermentations (Y-ETO
H,Y-xylose = 0.2-0.40 g g(-1), 75-100%, and Y-xylltol = 0-0.2 g g(-1) compa
red to Y-ETOH,Y-xylose = 0.15 g g(-1), 56%, Y-xylitol = 0.51 g g(-1), respe
ctively). To increase ethanol levels and reduce process time, fed-batch fer
mentations were performed in a single stage reactor employing two phases: (
1) rapid aerobic growth on D-xylose (mu = 0.32 h(-1)) to high cell densitie
s; (2) D-glucose addition and anaerobic conditions to produce ethanol (Y-ET
OH/xylose = 0.23 g g(-1)). The process generated high cell densities, 2 x 1
0(9) cells ml(-1), and produced 45-50 g L-1 ethanol within 50 h from a mixt
ure of D-glucose and D-xylose (compared to 30 g L-1 in 80 h in the best bat
ch process). The two-phase process minimized loss of cell viability, increa
sed D-xylose utilization, reduced process time, and increased final ethanol
levers compared to the batch process.