Statement of problem. Retrievability of cemented implant-supported fixed pr
ostheses is desirable. Retentive strengths of new provisional luting agents
have not been reported.
Purpose. This study compared the tensile bond strengths of 6 provisional lu
ting agents when used with cemented superstructures and 1 implant system.
Material and methods. Ten castings were fabricated and randomly paired with
abutment specimens. Castings were cemented and the assemblies were stored
in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 48 hours. Tensile bond strength nece
ssary to remove each casting was measured with a 500-kg load and a crosshea
d speed of 0.5 cm/min. Crown/abutment specimens were cleaned after testing,
and the testing procedure was repeated for a total of 6 luting agents (n =
10). Data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and Scheffe's anal
ysis (alpha = .05).
Results. Tensile bond strengths ranged between 1.29 and 4.08 MPa. The lowes
t tensile bond strengths were found to be statistically similar between Tem
p Bond and Provilink luting agents. Neo-Temp luting agent exhibited the hig
hest tensile bond strength (P<.01).
Conclusions. Temp Bond and Provilink luting agents exhibited the lowest mea
n tensile bond strengths. Neo-Temp luting agent exhibited a tensile bond st
rength more than 3 times that of Temp Bond luting agent.