There is a powerful tension between the context-specific analyses whic
h figure prominently in the social sciences in recent years and the em
phasis on universal human dynamics which characterizes cross-cultural
psychology. Using the example of ethnic conflict I seek to bridge the
two and suggest that underlying the thick description of single confli
cts as the parties understand them is what an earlier generation of ps
ychological anthropologists called ''the psychic unity of mankind,'' r
eferring to deep structural similarities in all cultures, which make u
s human (Spiro, 1987). I propose that a cultural analysis of ethnic co
nflict can effectively build an explanation putting each conflict in a
context which highlights what the parties believe is at stake; identi
fying both the concrete interests and threats to identity crucial to t
he disputants; linking interests and identities to psychocultural inte
rpretations and the motives underlying them; and proposing that succes
sful settlement of ethnic conflicts means that the parties themselves
must actively work toward proposals which address both their competing
interests and cope identity needs.