P. Ravn et al., Bone densitometry: A new, highly responsive region of interest in the distal forearm to monitor the effect of osteoporosis treatment, OSTEOPOR IN, 9(4), 1999, pp. 277-283
The bisphosphonates have been introduced as alternatives to hormone replace
ment therapy (HRT) for the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteo
porosis. The expected increasing application in at clinical practice demand
s cost-effective and easily handled methods to monitor the effect on bone.
The weak response at the distal forearm during antiresorptive treatment has
restricted the use of bone densitometry at this region. We describe a new
model for bone densitometry at the distal forearm, by which the response ob
tained is comparable to the response in other regions where bone densitomet
ry is much more expensive and technically complicated. By computerized iter
ation of single X-ray absorptiometry forearm scans we defined a region with
65% trabecular bone. The region was analyzed in randomized, double-masked,
placebo-controlled trials: a 2-year trial with alendronate (n = 69), a 1-y
ear trial with ibandronate (n = 141) and a 2-year trial with HRT (n = 121).
Bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal forearm revealed a highly statist
ically significant dose-related response and increased 3-5% per year with 2
.5 mg ibandronate, 10 mg alendronate or HRT, whereas the decrease in the pl
acebo groups was 1-3% (p < 0.001). The response at the distal forearm was s
imilar to the response at the lumbar spine and hip. In conclusion, trabecul
ar bone at the distal forearm is as responsive to antiresorptive treatment
as trabecular bone in other skeletal regions. Bone densitometry at the new
region of interest in the distal forearm has comparable performance charact
eristics to more expensive and technically demanding methods. The method is
more accessible clinically and potential as an alternative for monitoring
bone changes during antiresorptive treatment.