J. Mant et al., EPIDEMIOLOGY OF GENITAL PROLAPSE - OBSERVATIONS FROM THE OXFORD-FAMILY-PLANNING-ASSOCIATION STUDY, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 104(5), 1997, pp. 579-585
Objective To explore the epidemiology of uterovaginal and post-hystere
ctomy prolapse. Design Cohort study. Setting Seventeen large family pl
anning clinics in England and Scotland. Population 17,032 women who at
tended family planning clinics between 1968 and 1974, aged between 25
and 39 years at study entry. Methods Annual follow up by interview, po
stal or telephone questionnaire until July 1994. Further details on al
l hospital admissions were obtained from the hospital discharge summar
ies. All women were flagged at time of recruitment in the NHS central
registers. Main outcome measure In-patient admission with diagnosis of
prolapse (ICD codes 8th Revision 623.0-623.9). Results The incidence
of hospital admission with prolapse is 2.04 per 1000 person-years of r
isk. Age, parity, calendar period and weight were significantly associ
ated with risk of an inpatient admission with prolapse after adjustmen
t for principal confounding factors. Significant trends were observed
with regard to smoking status and obesity (Quetelet Index) at entry to
the study and risk of prolapse. Social class, oral contraceptive use
and height were not significantly associated with risk of prolapse. Th
e incidence of prolapse which required surgical correction following h
ysterectomy was 3.6 per 1000 person-years of risk. The cumulative risk
rises from 1% three years after a hysterectomy to 5% 15 years after h
ysterectomy. The risk of prolapse following hysterectomy is 5.5 times
higher (95% CI 3.1-9.7) in women whose initial hysterectomy was for ge
nital prolapse as opposed to other reasons. Conclusion Among the poten
tial risk factors that were investigated, parity shows much the strong
est relation to prolapse.