Jp. Brun, Narrow rifts versus wide rifts: inferences for the mechanics of rifting from laboratory experiments, PHI T ROY A, 357(1753), 1999, pp. 695-710
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Laboratory experiments on analogue models of the lithosphere are useful too
ls to study tectonic processes and, in particular, to test physical hypothe
ses. They complement numerical modelling because the inherent limitations o
f each method are different. The basic principles of the method are recalle
d with particular application to models simulating the brittle-ductile laye
ring of continental crust and lithosphere using sand and silicone putties t
o simulate the frictional and viscous behaviour of rocks. A selection of ex
periments is used to examine the role of rheology on the development of cru
stal-scale extensional structures: continental rifts, passive margins, wide
extended domains, and core complexes. The difference between narrow rifts
and wide rifts is attributed to the type of mechanical instability that can
develop for a given type of lithospheric strength profile: namely necking
versus spreading. Necking occurs preferentially in a stable lithosphere tha
t has a four layer-type of strength profile with the greatest strength loca
ted in the sub-Moho mantle. It gives birth to narrow rifts, from continenta
l rifts to passive margins. Spreading occurs preferentially in a thickened
lithosphere whose strength profile, after thermal relaxation, exhibits maxi
mum strength at the base of upper brittle crust. It gives birth to wide rif
ts, such as the Basin and Range of the western United States or the Aegean.
Core complexes are not considered to represent a particular mode of extens
ion but are anomalies in wide rifts.