The proper selection of a recipient vessel is essential for the success of
free tissue transfer, especially when the transfer is to the lower extremit
y. However, a general agreement on which vessel to use has not been reached
yet. Conflicting data have been reported on the survival and outcome of th
e transferred flaps, depending on the vessel used or the location of anasto
mosis. The aim of this study was to identify the patterns and problems in t
he selection of recipient vessels for free tissue transfer to the lower ext
remity and to establish a general guideline for proper selection.
From September of 1990 to December of 1997, 50 consecutive, microvascular,
free tissue transfers were performed on the lower extremity. The causes req
uiring soft-tissue coverage included trauma (25), unstable scar (11), chron
ic osteomyelitis (7), and tumors (7). The mean follow-up period was 22.4 mo
nths (range, 2 to 41 months). In 25 cases, the posterior tibial vessel was
used as the recipient vessel. The microvascular anastomosis was done proxim
al to the zone of injury in 45 cases.
The two most important factors in the selection of a recipient vessel are t
he site of injury and the vascular status of the lower extremity. Less impo
rtant factors include the flap to be used, method, and site of microvascula
r anastomosis.
All the currently feasible options for recipient vessels are included, and
the opinions of other surgeons are reviewed. A general guideline is establi
shed, and an algorithm for the proper selection of a recipient vessel is pr
oposed. This algorithm is a fast and convenient guide for evaluating the wo
und and planning the free flap to the lower extremity.