Sensory changes after traditional and ultrasound-assisted liposuction using computer-assisted analysis

Citation
Sa. Trott et al., Sensory changes after traditional and ultrasound-assisted liposuction using computer-assisted analysis, PLAS R SURG, 103(7), 1999, pp. 2016-2025
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
ISSN journal
00321052 → ACNP
Volume
103
Issue
7
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2016 - 2025
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-1052(199906)103:7<2016:SCATAU>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Postoperative sensory changes (i.e., hypesthesias) that occur after suction -assisted lipoplasty (SAL) are expected clinical sequelae. These disturbanc es usually return to normal within several weeks to months postoperatively. The presumed mechanism of injury is direct trauma to the peripheral nerves from the suction cannula. In addition, the potential for demyelination of peripheral nerves secondary to cavitation during ultrasound-assisted liposu ction (UAL) is well known. Quantitative data describing hypesthesia after b oth procedures are limited. The purpose of this study was to objectively ev aluate the severity and duration of postoperative hypesthesia after liposuc tion to better educate patients preoperatively. Furthermore, the authors us e the three-stage UAL technique and wanted to determine whether a clinical difference in sensory return existed between suction- and ultrasound-treate d areas. A total of 21 patients underwent liposuction performed by the senior author (R.J.R.). The abdomen, flanks, thighs, and medial knees were tested for ob jective sensation with the Pressure Specified Sensory Device preoperatively and at 2, 6, and 10 weeks postoperatively. A total of 102 sites were teste d. On average, the SAL-treated areas improved to normal sensation by 6 week s, whereas the UAL-treated areas took, on average, 10 weeks to recover. The severity of the hypesthesia was not correlated with larger aspiration volu mes or longer UAL exposure time per site. At 10 weeks, 90 percent of UAL-tr eated patients and 89 percent of liposuction patients overall had recovered normal sensation. This study provides the body-contouring surgeon with goo d, objective data with which to educate patients regarding sensory return a fter liposuction.