Parameters of the surface profile such as average peak height obtained by t
he conventional method using the peak frequency (count) distributions are w
ell known. It is suggested that for tribological uses such as in contact an
alternative approach is to use probabilities rather than frequency of occu
rrence as the basis for peak parameter evaluation. An alternative interpret
ation of peak count and its relevance is given. The differences between the
se two approaches are obtained in general random process terms and in a mor
e specific form using multinormal theory. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. Al
l rights reserved.