Recent predictions of growth in human populations and food supply suggest t
hat there will be a need to substantially increase food production in the n
ear future. One possible approach to meeting this demand, at least in part,
is the control of pests and diseases, which currently cause a 30-40% loss
in available crop production. In recent years, strategies for controlling p
ests and diseases have tended to focus on short-term, single-technology int
erventions, particularly chemical pesticides. This model frequently applies
even where so-called integrated pest management strategies are used becaus
e in reality, these often are dominated by single technologies (e.g., bioco
ntrol, host plant resistance, or bio-pesticides) that are used as replaceme
nts for chemicals. Very little attention is given to the interaction or com
patibility of the different technologies used. Unfortunately, evidence sugg
ests that such approaches rarely yield satisfactory results and are unlikel
y to provide sustainable pest control solutions for the future. Drawing on
two case histories, this paper demonstrates that by increasing our basic un
derstanding of how individual pest control technologies act and interact, n
ew opportunities for improving pest control can be revealed. This approach
stresses the need to break away from the existing single-technology, pestic
ide-dominated paradigm and to adopt a more ecological approach built around
a fundamental understanding of population biology at the local farm level
and the true integration of renewable technologies such as host plant resis
tance and natural biological control, which are available to even the most
resource-poor farmers.