The food system dominates anthropogenic disruption of the nitrogen cycle by
generating excess fixed nitrogen. Excess fixed nitrogen, in various guises
, augments the greenhouse effect, diminishes stratospheric ozone, promotes
smog, contaminates drinking water, acidifies rain, eutrophies bays and estu
aries, and stresses ecosystems. Yet, to date, regulatory efforts to limit t
hese disruptions largely ignore the food system. There are many parallels b
etween food and energy. Food is to nitrogen as energy is to carbon. Nitroge
n fertilizer is analogous to fossil fuel. Organic agriculture and agricultu
ral biotechnology play roles analogous to renewable energy and nuclear powe
r in political discourse. Nutrition research resembles energy end-use analy
sis. Meat is the electricity of food. As the agriculture and food system ev
olves to contain its impacts on the nitrogen cycle, several lessons can be
extracted from energy and carbon: (i) set the goal of ecosystem stabilizati
on; (ii) search the entire production and consumption system (grain, livest
ock, food distribution, and diet) for opportunities to improve efficiency;
(iii) implement cap and-trade systems for fixed nitrogen; (iv) expand resea
rch at the intersection of agriculture and ecology, and (v) focus on the fo
od choices of the prosperous. There are important nitrogen-carbon links. Th
e global increase in fixed nitrogen may be fertilizing the Earth, transferr
ing significant amounts of carbon from the atmosphere to the biosphere, and
mitigating global warming. A modern biofuels industry someday may produce
biofuels from crop residues or dedicated energy crops, reducing the rate of
fossil fuel use, while losses of nitrogen and other nutrients are minimize
d.