Machinery of government arrangements attract a diverse and detailed literat
ure, but surprisingly little comparative research. This article provides a
graphically presented indication of functional changes in the architecture
of national government in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom between
1950 and 1997. An analysis finds interesting national differences, with sha
rp changes in practice in Australia and Canada, but more gradual incrementa
l adjustment in the United Kingdom. The correlation between parties and mac
hinery change is weak for Canada and the United Kingdom, but all countries
demonstrate stronger Links between elections, new prime ministers and machi
nery of government changes. Further, all tend to oscillate between many spe
cialist departments and fewer, broader agencies. The explanation for such m
achinery change, we argue, is found in the political, policy and administra
tive calculations made by prime ministers in Westminster-style parliamentar
y systems.