L. Massardo et al., Predictive capacity of double stranded anti DNA antibodies for relapses inpatients with inactive systemic lupus erythematosus, REV MED CHI, 127(4), 1999, pp. 411-420
Background: Patients with inactive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and e
levated high affinity double-stranded anti-DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA), mea
sured using Farr technique, would have a risk of relapse that fluctuates be
tween 40 to 80% according to different series. Aim: To study the associatio
n between anti-dsDNA levels measured using Farr technique and disease activ
ity and their predictive capacity for relapses. Material and methods: Anti-
dsDNA antibodies were measured according to Farr method in 60 healthy subje
cts, 69 patients with other connective tissue diseases and in 120 patients
with SLE. Farr positive were considered those individuals with anti-dsDNA l
evels over 10.4 IU/ml. Disease activity, assessed using MEXSLEDAI score was
related with anti-dsDNA levels in 101 patients. Forty seven patients with
inactive disease were followed for 17+/-14 months. Results: Anti-dsDNA leve
ls were 3+/-2.5 IU/ml (range 1-26) in subjects without LED, and 127+/-500 I
U/ml (range 1-5280) in patients with LED. Sixty subjects had all active SLE
and 43 (72%) were Farr positive; in 41 the disease was inactive and 13 (32
%) were Farr positive (p<0.001), OR 5.45. Twelve of the 47 followed patient
s had a relapse and 10 (83%) were Farr positive. Of those that did not have
a relapse, 13 (37%) were Farr positive (p<0.02, RR 5.22). Six of 15 patien
ts that were followed for more than on year (40%), were Farr positive. Conc
lusions: Elevated anti-dsDNA antibodies measured using Farr technique on pa
tients with inactive generalised lupus erythematosus, predicted the risk of
relapse. However less than half of patients with inactive disease and elev
ated Farr relapsed in a period of one year. The need to treat patients with
inactive SLE and positive Farr should therefore be considered debatable.