The destruction of indigenous, tribal peoples in remote and/or frontier reg
ions of the developing world is often assumed to be the outcome of inexorab
le, even inevitable forces of progress.
People are not so much killed, they become extinct. Terms such as ethnocide
, cultural genocide or developmental genocide suggest a distinct form of 'o
ff the map' elimination which implicitly discourages comparison with Other
acknowledged examples of genocide. By concentrating on a little-known case
study, that of the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) in Bangladesh, this article
argues that this sort of categorisation is misplaced. Not only is the dest
ruction or attempted destruction of fourth world peoples central to the pat
tern of contemporary genocide but, by examining such specific examples, we
can mol-e clearly delineate the phenomenon's more general wellsprings and p
rocesses. The example of the CHT does have its own peculiar features; not l
east what has been termed here its 'creeping' nature. In other respects, ho
wever, the efforts of a new nation-state to overcome its structural weaknes
ses by attempting a forced-pace consolidation and settlement of its one, al
legedly, unoccupied resource-rich frontier region closely mirrors other sta
te-building, developmental agendas which have been confronted with communal
resistance. The ensuing crisis of state-communal relations, however, canno
t be viewed in national isolation. Bangladesh's drive to develop the CHT ha
s not only been funded by Western finance and aid but is closely linked to
its efforts to integrate itself rapidly into a Western dominated and regula
ted international system. It is in these efforts 'to realise what is actual
ly unrealisable' that the relationship between a flawed state power and gen
ocide can be located.