Radio Telescopes for SETI searches are less demanding than general purpose
astronomical radio telescopes. This provides an opportunity to exploit econ
omical approaches in designing SETT systems. Radio Telescopes in low Earth
orbit offer no discernible advantages to SETI; indeed, they probably would
perform more poorly than a telescope in any other location. Telescopes in g
eosynchronous orbits would be sufficiently far from Earth to mitigate great
ly the deleterious effect of human radio transmissions. Telescopes on the f
ar side of the moon would be superb both from a radio interference standpoi
nt, and from a civil engineering standpoint. Single-reflector telescopes as
large as 50 kilometers in diameter could be constructed with conventional
materials. However, their costs appear prohibitive. The asteroid belt and t
he outer solar system are unpromising places to place a large radio telesco
pe. Perhaps the ultimate radio telescope would utilise the sun as a gravita
tional lens, focusing radiation on free-flying 10-meter class or possibly l
arger radio telescopes located at distances of the order of 1000 A.U. from
the sun. Such a combination has an energy collecting area at 10 centimeters
wavelength equivalent to that of a radio telescope about 11 kilometers in
diameter, or of the order of 3000 Arecibo radio telescopes. Such a system c
ould detect transmitters with EIRP of the order of a gigawatt at a distance
of the order of the distance to the galactic center. (C) 1999 Published by
Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.