Cisplatin ototoxicity - The importance of baseline audiometry

Citation
Jl. Nagy et al., Cisplatin ototoxicity - The importance of baseline audiometry, AM J CL ONC, 22(3), 1999, pp. 305-308
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
ISSN journal
02773732 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
305 - 308
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-3732(199906)22:3<305:CO-TIO>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The role and optimal use of audiometry in monitoring for cisplatin ototoxic ity are incompletely defined. Audiograms were obtained from 217 patients be fore treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for cancers of the esophag us, lung, or head and neck. Posttreatment audiometry then was conducted in 53 of these patients. Chemotherapy consisted of two (87%) or three (13%) co urses of cisplatin at a dose of 20 mg/m(2)/day given as a continuous intrav enous infusion over 4 days. Simultaneous 5-fluorouracil or paclitaxel also was given, and 38% received concurrent radiation therapy to the head and ne ck. Air-conduction thresholds for each ear were obtained at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 Hz. Three three-frequency pure-tone averages (P TA) also were calculated. Framingham gender-specific, age-adjusted norms we re used, beginning at age 60 to correct for presbycusis, and the upper limi t of normal was calculated as the greater of the Framingham mean plus twice the standard error, or 25 dB. Hearing abnormality was defined as a thresho ld >10 dB above the norm for any PTA, or >20 dB above the norm for any indi vidual frequency. Hearing loss was defined as an elevation over baseline th reshold of >10 dB for any PTA or >20 dB for any individual frequency. Of th e 217 patients who underwent baseline testing, 57 (26%) were found to have hearing abnormality in excess of the expected presbycusis. Post-cisplatin a udiograms demonstrated hearing loss in 19 of the 53 retested patients (36%) when compared with their own baseline. As determined by tympanometry, none of these subjects had a conductive component to their hearing loss. These observations were independent of the duration of follow-up after treatment and of the total dose of cisplatin administered. The authors conclude that significant preexisting hearing abnormality is common in this patient popul ation and that, even after low-dose cisplatin administration, additional he aring loss occurs frequently. Baseline testing is mandatory if follow-up st udies are to be adequately interpreted.