Concerned about the inadequacy of a centralized database and the importance
of low morbidity and mortality on carotid endarterectomy efficacy, the Sou
th Carolina Vascular Surgical Society prospectively instituted a computer r
egistry for carotid procedures performed by its members, to establish a sta
tewide standard of practice. From January 1994 through December 1997, 23 of
the 30 physician members voluntarily registered data on 1652 carotid opera
tions at 14 hospitals into a central database. Blinded results were reviewe
d biannually. Complete data (1995-1997) were available for 1199 cases. The
patients tended to be >64 years old (72%), male (62%), and white (93%). Car
otid endarterectomy was the most frequently performed operation (90%). Peri
operative complications (less than or equal to 30 days) occurred in 173 pat
ients (14.4%), including stroke (n = 19; 1.6%), death (n = 8; 0.7%), and st
roke/death (n = 25; 2.0%). Although 23 surgeons (77% of the society) contri
buted some data, only 10 surgeons (33%) contributed complete data on >10 pa
tients/year. Despite biannual efforts to boost participation, case entry re
mained stable (1994, 358; 1995, 347; 1996, 425; and 1997, 427), representin
g about one-third of the estimated carotid procedures performed in the stat
e during that period. The cost of the registry was approximately $11,500. A
udit of 8 surgeons revealed a >95 per cent match against the statewide disc
harge database and low error rate versus independent medical record review.
This experience confirms that excellent outcomes after carotid endarterect
omy are not limited to a few select centers and can be accomplished by adeq
uately trained surgeons in a variety of institutional settings. Incomplete
physician participation, however, inevitably raises questions about the uti
lity of such efforts. Until volunteer registries induce full participation
by heightening perceived physician benefit, their role will remain limited
for future outcomes research.