Background: Two antiinflammatory therapies that have been effective in prev
enting acid-induced lung injury were evaluated. Specifically, their effects
on a subsequent bacterial-airspace challenge were compared, Bacteria were
instilled 24 h after acid-induced lung injury. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO-1
was used as the bacteria, because its effects in healthy lungs was documen
ted previously.
Methods: New Zealand white rabbits were anesthetized and three pretreatment
s were administered: (1) pentoxifylline pretreatment (a 20-mg/kg bolus dose
and then 6 mg . kg(-1) . h(-1) given intravenously), (2) 1 ml anti-tumor n
ecrosis factor alpha antiserum given intravenously, or (3) normal saline gi
ven intravenously. The pretreatment doses were shown previously to prevent
acid-induced lung injury. Then 1.2 ml/kg hydrochloric acid (HCl), pH 1.25,
was instilled into the rabbits' right lungs, All the animals underwent mech
anical ventilation for 8 h, Twenty-four hours after the acid instillation,
the rabbits were anesthetized again and 2 ml/kg (10(9) colony forming units
/ml) PAO-1 was instilled into their left lungs. The rabbits' breathing was
aided by mechanical ventilation for another 8 h, and then they were killed
and exsanguinated.
Results: Both pretreatments attenuated the acid-induced lung injury of the
noninstilled left lungs. Arterial oxygen tension and the lung edema of pret
reated, acid-exposed animals were significantly and almost equally improved
(compared with no pretreatments) by either of the pretreatments. However,
when the bacteria were instilled into the left lungs 24 h after the acid in
jury, the pentoxifylline pretreatment but not the anti-tumor necrosis facto
r alpha pretreatment prevented much of the bacteria-induced lung injury, Pe
ntoxifylline pretreatment significantly improved the measurements of left l
ung edema and epithelial and endothelial permeability, There was also a tre
nd for improved oxygenation in the pentoxifylline pretreated and infected a
nimals, In contrast, the anti-tumor necrosis factor a pretreatment did not
prevent the 1,bacteria induced lung Injury and increased some of the measur
ements of lung injury.
Conclusions: Two antiinflammatory therapies that prevented acid-induced lun
g injury to the noninstilled left lungs had significantly different effects
on a subsequent bacteria induced lung injury to the left lungs. The therap
ies differed in their mechanism of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade, an
d tills mag: have affected the bacteria induced injury to the lungs.