Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognosis and response to systemic therapy

Citation
D. Rayson et al., Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognosis and response to systemic therapy, ANN ONCOL, 10(4), 1999, pp. 413-419
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
09237534 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
413 - 419
Database
ISI
SICI code
0923-7534(199904)10:4<413:MBCPAR>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Background: Metaplastic breast cancer is a rare disease with little informa tion available to guide therapy. The goals of this study were to describe t he patient characteristics, systemic therapies and clinical outcomes of all patients with primary metaplastic breast cancer treated at Mayo Clinic bet ween 1976 and 1997. Patients and methods: Patients were identified through the medical index of Mayo Clinic. Clinical information was abstracted from the medical record o f each patient. A literature search using MEDLINE and CANCERLIT for the yea rs 1966-1997 was performed to identify all previously reported case series in the English language containing 10 or more patients. Results: Twenty-seven patients were identified with a median age at diagnos is of 59 years (range 39-90 years). The median tumor size was 3.4 cm (range 0.5-7.0 cm). One patient had metastatic disease at presentation. Twenty-th ree patients had information available on nodal status, estrogen receptor ( ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. Twenty patients (87%) were node- negative and three patients (13%) were both ER and PR positive. Disease-fre e survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for those who pres ented with local-regional disease. The three-year DFS was 40% (95% CI: 23%- 73%) and the three-year OS was 71% (95% CI: 51%-97%). In univariate analysi s, those patients 60 years of age or older at diagnosis were found to have an increased DFS (P = 0.011). Among those with prior estrogen use, both DFS (P = 0.022) and OS (P = 0.003) were decreased. Thirteen patients (50%) dev eloped metastases with a median DFS time of 2.4 years. Ten different chemot herapy regimens were utilized for metastatic disease and one partial respon se was observed. There were no responses to tamoxifen in four patients with metastatic disease. Median survival after the development of metastases wa s eight months. Conclusions: Despite presenting more commonly as nodenegative disease, DFS and OS in metaplastic breast cancer is decreased compared to typical adenoc arcinomas. Systemic therapy also appears to be less effective. Patients wit h metaplastic breast cancer, particularly those with metastatic disease cou ld be appropriate candidates for innovative therapeutic regimens.