Background: Metaplastic breast cancer is a rare disease with little informa
tion available to guide therapy. The goals of this study were to describe t
he patient characteristics, systemic therapies and clinical outcomes of all
patients with primary metaplastic breast cancer treated at Mayo Clinic bet
ween 1976 and 1997.
Patients and methods: Patients were identified through the medical index of
Mayo Clinic. Clinical information was abstracted from the medical record o
f each patient. A literature search using MEDLINE and CANCERLIT for the yea
rs 1966-1997 was performed to identify all previously reported case series
in the English language containing 10 or more patients.
Results: Twenty-seven patients were identified with a median age at diagnos
is of 59 years (range 39-90 years). The median tumor size was 3.4 cm (range
0.5-7.0 cm). One patient had metastatic disease at presentation. Twenty-th
ree patients had information available on nodal status, estrogen receptor (
ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. Twenty patients (87%) were node-
negative and three patients (13%) were both ER and PR positive. Disease-fre
e survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for those who pres
ented with local-regional disease. The three-year DFS was 40% (95% CI: 23%-
73%) and the three-year OS was 71% (95% CI: 51%-97%). In univariate analysi
s, those patients 60 years of age or older at diagnosis were found to have
an increased DFS (P = 0.011). Among those with prior estrogen use, both DFS
(P = 0.022) and OS (P = 0.003) were decreased. Thirteen patients (50%) dev
eloped metastases with a median DFS time of 2.4 years. Ten different chemot
herapy regimens were utilized for metastatic disease and one partial respon
se was observed. There were no responses to tamoxifen in four patients with
metastatic disease. Median survival after the development of metastases wa
s eight months.
Conclusions: Despite presenting more commonly as nodenegative disease, DFS
and OS in metaplastic breast cancer is decreased compared to typical adenoc
arcinomas. Systemic therapy also appears to be less effective. Patients wit
h metaplastic breast cancer, particularly those with metastatic disease cou
ld be appropriate candidates for innovative therapeutic regimens.