Continuous delivery of venous 5-fluorouracil and arterial 5-fluorodeoxyuridine for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: feasibility and tolerance in a randomized phase II trial comparing flat versus chronomodulated infusion

Citation
C. Focan et al., Continuous delivery of venous 5-fluorouracil and arterial 5-fluorodeoxyuridine for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: feasibility and tolerance in a randomized phase II trial comparing flat versus chronomodulated infusion, ANTI-CANC D, 10(4), 1999, pp. 385-392
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
ISSN journal
09594973 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
385 - 392
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-4973(199904)10:4<385:CDOV5A>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy combining regional hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of fluorodeoxyuridine (HAI FUDR) and systemic venous infusion of 5-fluorouraci l (i.v. 5-FU) was delivered against liver metastases from colorectal cancer . The hypothesis that chronomodulation of delivery rate along the 24 h time scale would improve the tolerable doses of both drugs was tested. Combined HAI FUDR (80 mg/m(2)/day) and i.v. 5-FU (1200 mg/m(2)/day) were administer ed for five consecutive days every 3 weeks, either as a constant rate infus ion (schedule A, 27 patients) or as chronotherapy (schedule B, 29 patients) . This latter regimen consisted of a sinusoidal modulation of the delivery rate over the 24 h scale with a maximum at 16:00 for FUDR and 4:00 for 5-FU . Intrapatient dose escalation up to the individual maximum tolerated doses (MTD) was planned for both drugs in the absence of any previous grade 3 or 4 toxicity. All patients had metastatic colorectal cancer, with adjuvant o r palliative chemotherapy given to six patients (22%) on schedule A and 12 patients on schedule B (41%). Severe stomatitis occurred in 71% of the pati ents and was dose limiting, No hepatic toxicity was encountered. Dose reduc tions of 5-FU and/or FUDR were required for 17 of 27 patients on schedule A (63%) as compared to 11 of 29 patients on schedule B (38%), following reac hing the individual MTD (p < 0.05). Over the first six cycles, patients on schedule B received higher doses (mg/m(2)/cycle; FUDR: 522 +/- 85 versus 49 9 +/- 50, p=0.004 and 5-FU: 5393 +/- 962 versus 5136 +/- 963, p=0.009) and higher dose intensities (mg/m(2)/week; FUDR: 164 +/- 46 versus 151 +/- 52, p=0.018 and 5-FU: 1652 +/- 478 versus 1553 +/- 535, p < 0.041) of both drug s than patients on schedule A. As a result the number of courses with doses of 5-FU above 1200 mg/m(2)/day and/or FUDR above 110 mg/m(2)/day was large r in group B than in group A (5-FU, A: 67 of 268, 25% versus B: 133 of 321, 41% and FUDR, A: 86 of 268, 32% versus B: 155 of 321, 48%; p < 0.001). Obj ective responses were observed in 13 patients on schedule A (48%) and 11 pa tients on schedule B (38%). The results support the need for further explor ation of chronotherapy of colorectal cancer liver metastases with combined arterial and venous fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. [(C) 1999 Lippincott Wil liams & Wilkins.].