Lymph node involvement in renal cell carcinoma and survival chance by systematic lymphadenectomy

Citation
W. Schafhauser et al., Lymph node involvement in renal cell carcinoma and survival chance by systematic lymphadenectomy, ANTICANC R, 19(2C), 1999, pp. 1573-1578
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
ANTICANCER RESEARCH
ISSN journal
02507005 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
2C
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1573 - 1578
Database
ISI
SICI code
0250-7005(199903/04)19:2C<1573:LNIIRC>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Background: The value of systematic lymphadenectomy has been a matter of gi ent controversy for a long period of time. A recently published papa of a retrospective autopsy study generally doubts ifs therapeutic effectiveness, arguing that positive lymph nodes are nearly always associated with distan t metastases. Patients and Methods: Between 1974 and 1993 1035 patients suf fering from renal cell carcinoma with stages fi om cT I to 4, cM 0 were tre ated with curative intention. 51 % underwent radical abdominal tumor, nephr ectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy (n = 531, group A). In 199 patients (19 % group B) only macroscopically suspect lymph nodes were removed surgic ally. All other patients underwent radical lumbar tumour nephrectomy withou t lymphadenectomy (Iz = 305, 29 % group C). Results: Mean age of group A wa s 55,5 +/- 10 years, B 60,3 +/- 11 and C 66,5 +/- II. Median followup for a ll groups was 115 +/- 63 months. Median amount of removed lymph nodes was 1 8 in group A, 6 in group B and 3 in group C. N-categories for each group we re pN 1: 4 % 2 % I %; pN 2: 7 % 5 % 2 %;pN 3: 3 % 2 %, 1 %; pNx: 0 %, 35%, 67 % respectively. Group A with systematic lymphadenectomy had the least fa vourable tumour stage over all. Nevertheless longterm survival of this grou p is more favourable with 57 % +/- 6 when compared to group B with 50 +/- 1 2 % and C with 44 % +/- 9 %. 20 (27 %) of the 75 lymph node positive patien ts of group A who have been followed-lip Sor more than 5 years are still al ive. Conclusions: At least 4 % of all patients benefit from extensive lymph adenectomy. This may only be a relatively small proven effect for the entir e patient collective, but for a single lymph node positive patient this is an undoubtedly significant additional chance of survival especially when on e notes that presently there is no curative adjuvant therapy.